Comments regarding publications

  Comments regarding the Trans. PAMI Article, April 1999
The cause for the significant error rates reported for the image in Figure 11(i) has been discovered. The error was caused by a tricky bug in one of the programs involved. I appologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Updated error rates are given below:

TABLE 3 - updates

Heuristical method 11(i)
Laws filters 37.8%
Ring/wedge filters 48.3%
Dyadic Gabor filt. bk. 47.9%
Gabor filter bank (d) 54.8%
DCT 33.0%
Daubechies 4 (d) 30.1%
f16b (d) 28.5%
Co-occurrence 49.1%
AR 28.7%
Average 39.8%

TABLE 6 - updates

Optimized appraoches 11(i)
Eigenfilter 33.3%
Opt. repr. Gabor filter bank 67.5%
Prediction error filter 36.7%
Optimal Gabor filter, sigma=2 N/A
Optimal Gabor filter, sigma=4 N/A
Optimal Gabor filter, sigma=8 N/A
Optimal Gabor filter, sigma=16 N/A
4-filter opt. Gabor filter bank 51.4%
6-filter opt. Gabor filter bank 45.4%
10-filter opt. Gabor filter bank 37.3%
J_MS 49.9%
J_U 30.5%
J_F N/A
BackProp. NN mask size 11 70.2%
BackProp. NN mask size 21 84.3%
Average 50.7%

TABLE 8 - updates

Full rate method 11(i)
Gabor filter bk. (a) 61.6%
Gabor filter bk. (b) 60.2%
Gabor filter bk. (c) 69.9%
Gabor filter bk. (d) 54.8%
Daubechies 4 (a) 45.5%
Daubechies 4 (b) 42.4%
Daubechies 4 (c) 49.4%
Daubechies 4 (d) 30.1%
Daubechies 6 (a) 45.4%
Daubechies 6 (b) 42.2%
Daubechies 6 (c) 50.9%
Daubechies 6 (d) 29.9%
Daubechies 8 (a) 43.4%
Daubechies 8 (b) 45.0%
Daubechies 8 (c) 53.9%
Daubechies 8 (d) 30.9%
Daubechies 10 (a) 44.7%
Daubechies 10 (b) 46.2%
Daubechies 10 (c) 53.4%
Daubechies 10 (d) 31.6%
f8a (a) 45.1%
f8a (b) 39.3%
f8a (c) 46.3%
f8a (d) 29.7%
f16b (a) 43.1%
f16b (b) 39.0%
f16b (c) 48.4%
f16b (d) 28.5%
f32d (a) 43.9%
f32d (b) 37.9%
f32d (c) 44.3%
f32d (d) 28.1%
F_2_1_smpl (a) 43.5%
F_2_1_smpl (b) 39.1%
F_2_1_smpl (c) 45.2%
F_2_1_smpl (d) 27.8%
F_2_1_09 (a) 43.6%
F_2_1_09 (b) 40.2%
F_2_1_09 (c) 53.4%
F_2_1_09 (d) 30.8%
Average 43.2%

TABLE 9 - updates

Decimated method 11(i)
Daubechies 4 (a) 56.9%
Daubechies 4 (b) 50.8%
Daubechies 4 (c) 55.8%
Daubechies 4 (d) 45.2%
Daubechies 6 (a) 52.9%
Daubechies 6 (b) 46.9%
Daubechies 6 (c) 51.8%
Daubechies 6 (d) 41.8%
Daubechies 8 (a) 54.5%
Daubechies 8 (b) 54.3%
Daubechies 8 (c) 59.0%
Daubechies 8 (d) 41.7%
Daubechies 10 (a) 53.4%
Daubechies 10 (b) 53.5%
Daubechies 10 (c) 53.3%
Daubechies 10 (d) 42.9%
f8a (a) 52.4%
f8a (b) 49.1%
f8a (c) 54.2%
f8a (d) 38.4%
f16b (a) 51.3%
f16b (b) 47.4%
f16b (c) 51.7%
f16b (d) 36.7%
f32d (a) 50.3%
f32d (b) 48.3%
f32d (c) 50.1%
f32d (d) 36.3%
F_2_1_smpl (a) 51.8%
F_2_1_smpl (b) 49.4%
F_2_1_smpl (c) 52.5%
F_2_1_smpl (d) 37.8%
F_2_1_09 (a) 52.8%
F_2_1_09 (b) 52.0%
F_2_1_09 (c) 54.6%
F_2_1_09 (d) 43.3%
Average 49.3%